Peer Review Process
Review Period
1. Review process will be done in range of 8 to 14 days.
2. One Reviewer in term of substantial, maximum article to review are 3 articles.
Substantial Review
1. Only to Reviewer that suitable with their field.
2. More than one Reviewer and also to make a review with technical issues of the article.
3. Relevance to the Conference topic.
4. Importance of the research / State-of-the-art.
5. Proper methodology.
6. Arguments and conclusions.
7. Academic Writing quality.
Archive Access Policy
The presentations that make up the current and archived conferences on this site have been made open access and are freely available for viewing, for the benefit of authors and interested readers.
commitee
Steering Commitee | Prof. Dr. Ganefri, Ph.D | Assoc. Prof Dr. Siti Fatimah, M.Pd, M.Hum |
Assoc. Prof, Dzikri Alhadi, M.Si | Assoc. Prof. Ahmad Rivauzi, M.Pdi | |
Dr. Yudi Antomi, M.Si | Dr. Arie Yulfa, M.Sc |
International Advisory Board | Prof. Dr. Péter Bagoly-Simó (Humbold University) | Prof. Wolfgang Kainz (University Vienna) |
Assoc. Prof Dr. Aziz Bin Shafie (University Malaya) |
|
Scientific Commitee | Prof. Dr. Syafri Anwar. M.Pd (Univ Negeri Padang) | Prof. Dedi Hermon, M.P (Univ Negeri Padang) |
Prof. Dr. rer. Nat Muh Aris Marfai, M.Sc (Head of Geospatial Agency) | Assoc. Prof. Yohandri, Ph.D (Univ Negeri Padang) | |
Assoc. Prof. Ernawati, M.Si (Univ Negeri Padang) | Assoc. Prof. Yurni Suasti, M.Si (Univ Negeri Padang) | |
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Iswandi. M.Si (Univ Negeri Padang) | Muslim Syamsuis Darwis, M.Eng (PT. Geo Hub Indonesia) |
ORGANIZING COMMITEE | |
Chairman | Dr. Widya Prarikeslan, M.Si (Univ Negeri Padang) |
Co-Conference Chair | Dr. Deded Chandra, M.Si (Univ Negeri Padang) |
Dr. Ratnawilis, M.P (Univ Negeri Padang) | |
Program | Risky Ramadhan, M.Si (Univ Negeri Padang) |
Dipo Caesario, M.T (Univ Negeri Padang) | |
Eva Purnamasari, M.Sc (Univ Negeri Padang) | |
Wikan Jaya Prihartanto, M.Sc (Univ Negeri Padang) | |
Muhammad Ismail, M.Sc (Univ Negeri Padang) | |
Review Period
Review Period
1. Review process will be done in range of 8 to 14 days.
2. One Reviewer in term of substantial, maximum article to review are 3 articles.
Substantial Review
1. Only to Reviewer that suitable with their field.
2. More than one Reviewer and also to make a review with technical issues of the article.
3. Relevance to the Conference topic.
4. Importance of the research / State-of-the-art.
5. Proper methodology.
6. Arguments and conclusions.
7. Academic Writing quality.
Review Information
Other Information
1. Author will be received 1 Technical Review and Minimum of 1 Substantial Reviewer both from Author Suggestion or/and choose from Committee.
2. When the article delivers to publisher, every Author will receive Galley Proof and Similarity Result with Turnitin and iThenticate. As an Author must agree with the editing version, except there is some correction from Author.
3. Every Author will receive information and status of the article after submitted.content
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.